Posted By
Csabo
on 2005-12-23
13:57:20
|  Re: Software Rarity
JamesC's list sounds pretty reasonable. For some reason I also think the rare numbers should be the lower ones, and not the other way around, although I can really see that this is just preference. Perhaps keep those, and allow middle values? So we'd have numbers from 1-9, and 8 could be stuff which is between his 4 and 5.
Point #1: take my above suggestion (values 1-9, explanations are what JamesC wrote). If no major objections, then this shall be done.
Point #2: So how will come to a consensus on the "correct" value? Plus4Vampyre, are you suggesting some kind of voting system? E.g. each member could set the value, and the average would be the end result? That could be pretty accurate in the end, but seeing the low voting particiation I think we would never fully populate the db. We need to talk this out a bit more. Opinions?
|
