Posted By
MIK
on 2003-06-24
 |  Re: Site Improvements
0-10 leads one to being too picky when voting.
3 Games:
Tom Thumb, Big Mac and Manic Miner. In there own unique way all are just as good, but how do they fair when I score with marks at 5, and then at 10? Thats trying to be honest about it...
Out of 5: Tom 5, Big Mac 5 and Manic Miner 4.
Out of 10: Tom 9, Big Mac 8, Manic Miner 7.
Out of 5 all 3 faired very well and show the sort of thinking I said above. But now out of 10 Manic Miner isn't looking so good. A little unfair as I know its a fine game, but to new comers 7 can mean (worth a look if your into this kind of game). But being honest again, Mainic Miner could of scored 79% meaning its much closer to Big Mac than it really looks and not so far away from Tom 
I have a lot of respect for many C16/Plus4 games, the older I get the more I take notice of what I might of turned my nose up at 15+ years ago. Invasion 2000AD is a beauty of an invaders clone, but 15 or so years ago I switched it off quicker than it took to load.
Out of 5 is being a bit more respectfull 
I've been out voted lol
Lets see the magic Csabo has added and take it from there.
PS: Anyone who gets cought marking a worthy game with a below average score will be band from the site OK ? (not)
Just be honest. Thankyou
|
