Posted By
SVS
on 2005-01-31
02:23:13
 |  Cbm4win
Is cbm4win able to wok with StarCommander on a n XP system?
If yes, what cable type is needed?
Thanx 
|
|
|
|
Posted By
JamesC
on 2005-02-01
00:05:32
| Re: Cbm4win
cbm4win requires an XA or XM cable, not a flat X1541 cable.
|
|
Posted By
Patrick
on 2005-02-22
19:04:30
| Re: Cbm4win
and where can i buy those cables?
|
|
|
|
Posted By
Sidius
on 2005-02-23
03:53:30
 | Re: Cbm4win
...or on "Ieehh-Pay" !
|
|
Posted By
TPSH
on 2005-04-09
12:13:03
| Re: Cbm4win
help.
hogy tudok .d64-es formátumot menteni commodoros lemezekről? főleg a 40 szektoros lemezekről...
|
|
Posted By
TPSH
on 2005-04-09
12:18:24
| Re: Cbm4win
szerk: a GUI verziban - ez kimaradt az előbb...vagy az csak a file másolásra van kiélezve?
|
|
Posted By
TPSH
on 2005-04-09
13:30:41
| Re: Cbm4win
ok,megtaláltam... :DD
|
|
Posted By
Chris
on 2005-04-09
16:47:19
| Re: Cbm4win
Hiya,
Cbm4win combined with a XM1541 cable works brilliantly with xp/2000. I use it all the time and its so much more convienent than using star commander and booting in dos.
Chris
|
|
Posted By
Degauss
on 2007-05-07
12:33:56
| Re: Cbm4win
cbm4win is my favorite tool too. sadly it lacks the newer DOS commands like "scratch" or "header".
|
|
Posted By
SVS
on 2007-05-07
12:37:30
| Re: Cbm4win
But there are functions in the GUI that do these operations as well 
|
|
Posted By
Degauss
on 2007-05-07
14:00:55
| Re: Cbm4win
yeah, but the gui... hm, i admit i don't like it
|
|
Posted By
Gaia
on 2007-05-07
14:42:35
| Re: Cbm4win
Yeah the GUI is _very_ buggy (and ugly, too). Simple things like changing directories don't work reliably. This is a real pity. I wonder how hard it would be to make a good one (or improve this)...
|
|
Posted By
Sidius
on 2007-05-08
02:29:48
| Re: Cbm4win
Do you also use the newest versions?
CBM4WIN v0.4.0. : http://www.trikaliotis.net/cbm4win#v0_4_0
GUI4CBM4WIN v0.6.5. : http://blog.paytonbyrd.com/?p=89
In the meantime, some bugs were already repaired...
|
|
Posted By
SVS
on 2007-05-08
03:04:07
| Re: Cbm4win
Indeed, the new version of GUI is good IMO reliable and faster.
I'm sure Gaia is referring to first version.
BTW a new version of Cbm4win is under testing and I can assure you all that it is even faster. Main feature of it is the support of many CBM devices linked (making possible to leave the X-cable connected while you are using Plus4).
|
|
Posted By
TLC
on 2007-05-08
16:19:52
| Re: Cbm4win
I use that stuff regularly under Linux... was not especially happy about its first appearance, had to create udev rules by hand, but after that, it worked reliably. I use no gui with it, btw.
|
|
Posted By
Luca
on 2007-05-08
16:34:53
 | Re: Cbm4win
Probably I'm the only one who uses his own 13 years old selfsoldered X1541 on XP with StarCommander.
|
|
Posted By
TLC
on 2007-05-08
18:27:19
| Re: Cbm4win
I also use self-built cables, but not the original X1541 one... that has been modified to an "XE1541" years ago, as I usually don't have a PC around me whose parallel port would still be compatible with the original one anymore. And for SC, it is nice (for sure), but not for multitasking environments... I slowly started to hate keeping a minimal Windows 98 setup for the sole purpose of transferring d64 images. The last time I used SC, I remember having booted up from a FreeDos CD... and then decided to reconsider if I could still get opencbm to work somehow .
|
|
Posted By
Ulysses777
on 2007-05-08
19:19:25
| Re: Cbm4win
The cable I currently use is a self-built XE1541, with detachable adaptors to convert it to an XM1541 or a parallel cable (XEP1541/XMP1541), the reason being so that I could still use it for both cbm4win and mnib (which required different cables at the time, and I was unable to get the parts for an XA1541)
|
|
Posted By
Toddeus
on 2007-05-18
11:29:42
| Bobner
Hello
[spam deleted by Luca]
Bye
|
|
Posted By
Barmental
on 2007-05-20
17:46:33
| Arriva!
Hello!
[I'm a stupid spammer!]
Cao!
|
|
