Posted By
bubis
on 2004-01-22
04:24:32
|  Multicolor DFli editr: FED v1.5pre is here!
Hi folks!
Dowload this and pixel or die!
http://bubis.resource.cx/plus4/dcd/FED15pre.zip
What is this: This is a simple DOS pixeling tool by DCD/WLS for the mcfli mode.
What is this mode: It is based on the simple multicolor mode but you can change ff15-16 in every line and color1-2 not in every 8x8 block (character) but every 8x2 block. (double badlines are generated in every second line.)
Selfviewer executable generator, the viewer source code and sample pictures are included.
|
|
Posted By
Bionic
on 2004-01-25
14:40:41
| Re: Multicolor DFli editr: FED v1.5pre is here!
Great work, now I just need the time,patience and talent to use it 
But how about adding mouse support and porting it to a more recent OS? If it is written in C you could use libsdl to port it in a few hours.
|
|
Posted By
Bionic
on 2004-01-25
19:02:56
| Re: Multicolor DFli editr: FED v1.5pre is here!
I am referring to porting it to Windows of course, although libsdl is basically platform independent.
|
|
Posted By
bubis
on 2004-01-26
02:54:46
| Re: Multicolor DFli editr: FED v1.5pre is here!
Well, as I know it is writen in Pascal.  And the author is DCD...
|
|
Posted By
Gaia
on 2004-01-26
06:30:07
| Re: Multicolor DFli editr: FED v1.5pre is here!
I think there are bindings in SDL for Pascal, too.
|
|
Posted By
Bionic
on 2004-01-26
12:58:42
| Re: Multicolor DFli editr: FED v1.5pre is here!
Pascal? Yeah I anticipated something like that - there are very few reasons to use DOS But maybe he could use delphi to port it..
|
|
Posted By
DCD
on 2004-01-27
02:28:42
| Re: Multicolor DFli editr: FED v1.5pre is here!
fed 1.5 is just a bugfixed version of fed 1.0, which is more than 8(!) years old. it was optimized to pc's of that age (i had a cyrix 100Mhz at that time), therefore the pascal source if full of direct video memory access (mem[$a000:0] := $00; etc), and inline assembly. so, it's nearly impossible to port, or at least it were much easier to write a completely new one for sdl/directx/etc.
on the another hand, i don't see, why should it be any better to have a win32 binary.
so shut up, and start pixeling
|
|
