Posted By
TLC on 2006-09-29 14:01:22
| Re: +4 biggest screen resolution
Bionic: If you mean that I wrote the above comment in the meaning of some kind of dishonour, then you might have missed the point. ...Remember, neither I could prove if true interlace (conforming to the tv-standard) was possible... so what gives? ...Yet, if you're angry about something related to me, you better tell me in a private or in e-mail... thank you.
Regarding your comment about the 416 pixels effect: false. 40*1.25=50. 48*1.25-8=52. Yours and mine result in exactly the same line timing (well, provided that yours is coded correctly... :-DDD ) It could possibly still stretched a bit, but I'm not that sure... At the left side, there is only one more place to steal, provided one needs PAL colors. Even if it could, it would possibly not be symmetric horizontally.
|